Best practices for QA Engineer to use Quickscrum

Home Best Practices QA Engineer

The role of Quality Assurance (QA) is responsible for guaranteeing the end-user a standard of quality and helping the software development team identify issues early in the process.

Below to promote your product quality assurance check, we list the most effective software QA practices you can adopt.

Set objectives and criteria for testing

QA engineers should evoke the preferences and testing demands of the client at the beginning of a software testing project. This includes making the following clear:

The preferences of the client

Being aware of the problems customers want to solve by testing and the parameters they use to measure the success of testing helps QA engineers to organize the testing process according to the needs of customers. Also, clarifying criteria help to estimate the resources needed for research by testing specialists.

Priorities in testing

At this point, QA engineers need to obtain a product functionality specification and a feature list of prioritized features to be tested first. QA developers will need to know who the product’s primary customers are and how they will use it.

QA engineers notify customers of the types of tests that are commonly applied to a certain type of product while investigating research preferences and why customers should decide on the types of tests they want to apply to their software project.

Reporting on outcomes

The QA team needs to understand what bugs to report, what data to include in reports, and what report format to use. Also the requirements and frequency of regression testing and retesting need to be addressed by the client and QA team.


A meeting schedule and channels of communication need to be developed by a client and a QA team. The customer must decide who should be contacted by the QA team in case they need to explain something or ask for more project details. The QA team also needs to know whether any non-standard reports, such as test descriptions, test reports, or time reports, are requested by the client.

Benefits for the QA team

One of the main benefits of setting goals and criteria for testing is that the team can determine the scope of tasks to conduct and schedule the testing process accordingly.

Overall the elicitation of research standards allows both the client and the QA team to determine the potential to achieve the objectives of the client through testing. Thus at the end of the research phase, the client does not have false expectations and is more likely to be satisfied with the findings. Understanding the expectations and specifications of a customer helps QA engineers to achieve outputs that the customer requires and would be pleased with. This also helps to establish a positive reputation for the QA team.

Benefits for the client

For the customer, a transparent workflow for the QA team is helpful as it allows them to be aware of the full range of test activities, the approximate cost of services, and the timetable for all QA operations. The customer will schedule the release date and create a marketing plan when the due date for the testing process is clear.

Clients can have realistic expectations concerning the testing process when testing requirements are clarified. Thus, research outcomes are more likely to fulfill the expectations of the client.

Build a simple workflow

For an effective quality assurance check, a well-crafted workflow is crucial. In many phases, experienced teams carry out monitoring.

They build a test plan first of all. A quality assurance team needs to develop a strategy that during production can direct the testing process. The team should define in this plan the scope of the project activities, the deadline for the completion of the testing process, and the price of the services.

The next step is to review all project specifications to verify if they meet quality standards and conform to the business needs of the product. Testing engineers obtain information on the domain of the evaluated applications to do this. This helps them to recognize the basic specifications that the software product requires to satisfy.

The QA team switches to functional testing after that. Quality assurance engineers test the product feature by feature at this stage to ensure that all functionality functions as it is intended to and according to requirements.

To guarantee product reliability, after product changes or new features are added, testing engineers run automated test cases. Regression testing is called this method. To determine the effect of changes on existing features, QA specialists use regression testing to ensure that new builds do not cause new bugs or device crashes.

Test reporting is another critical component of a successful workflow. After each testing iteration, a QA team can include test reports that provide a review of testing activities and final testing results. Daily test reporting helps to educate consumers about the current quality of the product, make them aware of the progress of testing, and give them more control over the process of quality assurance.

In addition to providing a defined task flow, a QA team needs to create an accurate distribution of roles and responsibilities. A RACI matrix is one of the most powerful tools to delegate tasks effectively between team members. A RACI matrix assigns duties for completing tasks and reviewing the deliverables of others. It also shows who needs to be consulted on project-related issues or told about them.

Benefits for the QA team

A well-developed workflow helps QA engineers understand their duties and improves the efficacy of the testing process.

QA teams can minimize rework and delays, which are common problems in both testing and production, by developing a particular workflow with a defined scope for all testing tasks.

Benefits for the client

For the customer, a transparent workflow for the QA team is helpful as it allows them to be aware of the full range of test activities, the approximate cost of services, and the timetable for all QA operations. A consistent workflow and daily reporting encourages customers to collaborate transparently with a QA team and allows the process of testing much more efficient.

Also, a simplified workflow helps testing engineers minimize the time needed for testing, which in turn decreases marketing time and saves money.

Check conformity to industry standards

To protect the confidential information of their clients, different sectors and jurisdictions have their laws and requirements that corporations should obey.

Benefits for the QA team

Compliance checking makes a QA team on-demand. Compliance testing includes experience and abilities that not every QA expert has. Therefore they would be appealing to clients if a QA team has the expertise to conduct compliance testing.

Benefits for the client

Laws and regulations are too costly to be ignored. Compliance monitoring allows company owners to ensure that their tech products comply with relevant domain standards and prevent big fines.

A compliance review helps to ensure that the sensitive information of end-users is secure and sound and that a violation of security is impossible.

Combine automated and manual testing

Each approach to manual and automated testing has its advantages and disadvantages. Manual testing involves test engineers manually run test cases to detect deviations from the tested software’s anticipated actions and report them to developers.

Tests are conducted automatically with the aid of scripts and automation testing tools by using the automated testing approach.

Combining manual and automated methods rather than selecting one or the other is the secret to successful software testing.

Benefits for the QA team

The use of both automated and manual testing speeds up the process of testing and increases the consistency of the product.

Another gain is that a team with a wide variety of abilities and competencies is generated by integrating these methods.

Benefits for the client

Manual and automated testing allows various areas and functionalities of a software product to be tested. Test coverage, which is one of the metrics used to measure the performance of the research process, is improved by incorporating each of these methods. There should be between 80% and 100% test coverage for a good quality assurance review.

Automated testing includes the creation of autotests that can be reused in the future. This makes modification and support of code easier.

Incorporate risk-based testing

Risk-based testing is a method that seeks to classify during the testing process the most dangerous threats. This strategy includes identifying project risks, prioritizing them, and preparing the testing process according to the priority of these risks. This helps QA engineers to focus on the most important risks that can harm the overall performance of the product.

Benefits for the QA team

At the early stages of software development, introducing a risk-based testing approach helps to simplify the code design and thus makes it easier to test the product.

Testing engineers focus on the problems most likely to arise during product usage while implementing a risk-based approach. It thus helps to minimize the number of activities for research.

Benefits for the client

A QA team checks certain pieces of functionality that are more vulnerable to errors by adopting a risk-based testing strategy. Thus even if you don’t have the money to verify all product features, you can get a high-quality product.

Conduct regular testing of regression

Regression testing after the upgrade of a software product is another successful quality assurance technique. QA engineers run a set of tests used earlier in the SDLC to verify whether the product performs as it should when conducting regression testing. Regression testing helps testing engineers to ensure that the essence of the software product is not compromised by enhancements or new functionality.

Benefits for the QA team

Regression testing requires the development of comprehensive documents for autotests to run. Device requirements, prototype designs, bug reports, operator performance, and other program-related details are included in this documentation. This data can be used not only by engineers for research but also by developers and stakeholders.

Another primary advantage of repeated regression testing is that it helps testing engineers to ensure that new product features do not compromise the core software’s reliability to maintain a high degree of product quality.

Benefits for the client

Bugs can be triggered by modifications to a software product. Regression testing helps QA engineers minimize a product’s number of glitches.

To speed up quality assurance reviews and simplify the software upgrade process, QA engineers use automated tests.

Using shift left testing

Shift left testing is one of the most critical quality assurance best practices. This method includes beginning the process of testing early in the SDLC. This means that in earlier stages of development, the research team is involved than in conventional approaches such as waterfall, where testing activities begin only after the stage of development is finished. At the early stages of the SDLC, finding and removing bugs is cheaper than at the final stages, when product production is almost complete. Finding bugs after release can be up to 30 times more costly than discovering them in the design process, according to IBM.

Benefits for the QA team

This approach relies on closer collaboration between the QA team and the developer team, giving QA engineers the chance from the very beginning to influence product development.

Also, this technique makes it possible to cover a product with testing at the early stages of the development process, enabling test engineers to find problems much sooner and improve the software quality.

Benefits for the client

You need to ensure good collaboration between your QA and development teams when beginning test activities as early as possible. Near and successful collaboration accelerates the process of growth, reduces the time to market, and reduces the cost of development.